Posts Tagged ‘politics’

Government Burdens on My Business (and what I want to do about it…)

May 28, 2012

The White House called me the other day – they have scheduled a conference call with me to explore a “few ideas”. This is the result of a scathing letter I wrote to President Obama in January.

My “Beefs”? They are “fuzzy”… It boils down to the burden from the total body of law. From my letter:

The law is additive in the United States – it does not diminish – it seems to grow and grow without bound. Every law has a cost – a cost to socialize, write, pass, publish, educate, enforce, comply with and audit. The more laws there are, the higher the social and economic cost of the total body of law.

My Objectives:

I am asking our Government to embark on a cultural shift to eliminate burdensome law, and I am asking our Government to write higher quality legislation that the person it pertains to can read and understand. And I am also asking the Government to foster small business in some new and innovative ways. In my letter, I focused on two areas of law that cost me time and money: tax law and immigration law. I’ll add a third category of law in my conference call: intellectual property or IP law.

Here are five things I want to accomplish for my business:

  1. Reduce the amount of time spent complying with the total body of law to less than a 10% burden of my productive time;
  2. Eliminate significant administrative expenses dedicated to legal compliance;
  3. Create access to skilled and experienced employees who may need visas;
  4. Create and exploit IP protections my business currently does not enjoy;
  5. Encourage law that is essential, minimal, straight forward and readable.

I spend about 20% of my productive time and thousands of dollars every year to comply with the laws I am exposed to in my business. I would much rather invest my time and money in my business. And have you read the law? I have read more than 120,000 pages of law, proposed legislation, instructions, guidelines, position papers, etc. over the years, and I can actually understand some of it – I say that in jest. The law is almost impossible for me to read and understand. Golly, you should be able to read the law and understand what your obligations are without too much of a struggle.

When I am uncertain about how to complete a form (I seem to file an inordinate number of forms), I start with a phone call to a government agency to seek an answer to my questions. My frustration is frequently amplified with every call I make until my frustration is overwhelming. Have you ever called the IRS with a question? Every agency of the Government works in roughly the same way – they are happy to read the law and locate resources in print or on-line for you, and that can be helpful, but they are unable to interpret the law.

Me – This is my question: “blah blah”;

Them – This is the law: “gobblety goop”;

Me “But what does that mean?”

Them “We can’t tell you what it means, we can just tell you what it says.”

Me “OK – what does this word mean? And this word? And this word? And this phrase?”

And on and on…

When the questions get down to the definition of words, well, I start to learn a few things and put things together in my brain. This is a frustrating “peeling the onion” process, but it can be productive none the less.

Another frustration that costs me hours of time and maintains a “simmering” level of frustration – agency registrations, on-line account maintenance and news dissemination. My company has more than a dozen agency registrations that require periodic attention. News and information is posted on-line by each agency, but you must visit each agency’s website to learn these things.

Here is what I intend to propose in a nutshell:

Tell me “what it means” !
Don’t force my company to engage with our attorneys and CPAs to get basic answers to fundamental questions. Provide constructive guidance to the small business. Produce resources that explain the law and describe “official” government interpretations of the law. This is a huge challenge, but the very exercise of addressing this problem will expose the poor quality and ambiguous nature of legislation for Congress to address. Tell me what it means, not what it says…

Give me one login!
Facebook has a neat credential server service. A growing number of websites let you login with your Facebook login. This is a big simplification for a lot of people. The Government has a few focal points for citizen access with a login credential – GRANTS.GOV is one example. Many agency websites use a GRANTS.GOV registration to provide basic registration information for their own registration processes, and this saves time – this is a good step forward.  USA.GOV is another focal point for citizen access, but it currently requires no login. It would be a tremendous step forward if government agencies used a central login resource for secure citizen online access – Login with USA.GOV!. For some uses, a second ID challenge or a biometric or device verification process is fine – mandatory for some uses. For most secure online access requirements with Government, though, let me login with one credential to any agency of the Government just like I login “with Facebook” for many commercial websites.

Offer RSS Services; Maintain an Interest Profile for E-mail News Notifications.
USA.GOV allows users to subscribe to RSS feeds – every agency of the Government should be required to offer RSS feeds to users. Many do, but not all… Further, every agency should maintain an “Interest Profile” for subject-specific e-mail notifications for news and events, bulletins, advisories, etc. Automated and highly focused e-mail notifications would help me stay abreast of news and changes I need to know about. Keep me informed as effortlessly as possible with focused, automated notifications.

The “Hobby” Business – Encourage it!
The IRS discourages the “hobby’ business. The IRS devotes resources to identify and stop a “hobby” business. I believe that a “hobby” business can spur innovation, create wealth and lead to much larger enterprises over time for more and more business owners. Why discourage small revenue-generating and innovative businesses that require long periods of time to flourish? Why stifle tinkering and plodding by uncertain and hesitant entrepreneurs? Why drive this business model into a lawless enterprise in the grey economy or black market? This is a “garden of opportunity” to foster and encourage.

Tax Law – Fewer Forms and Less Information for a Small Business.
Texas offers a huge time-saver for my company – a simple one-page “No Tax Due” annual franchise tax filing requirement that I qualify for because of the small size of my company. The IRS needs a form 1120-SIMPLE and a form K-1-SIMPLE, for example. Don’t ask about accounting methods, inventory valuation, previously taxed shareholder distributions, amortization or depreciation if my business is smaller than a certain employee count threshold or revenue threshold. Make it all very simple with a quick one-page form. Form 1120S, for example, already allows the filer to omit balance sheet information if revenue is less than a threshold amount, but I think the IRS can go much further to simplify things for me. Make my tax filings far simpler than they are so that I can invest my productive time and money in my business – just ask me for Revenue and Profit.

Immigration Law – Give me One or Two Express H1B Visas
A large business finds their necessary mix of skills and experience in their large numbers of employees. Conversely, the small business looks for the critical mix of skills and experience in the same person. In my business, I want to employ specific people I know who are immediately productive because they have previously been associated with my business and its mission for one reason or another. A specific example of this problem for me was a key employee working on a NSF grant awarded to my company. This employee on an F1 visa with an OPT extension can no longer work past this summer because their visa expires. Getting an H1B visa for this employee will take many months and cost thousands of dollars – time and money I don’t have and can’t afford. Because of National quotas, it would take years for a visa for this employee based upon their own conventional visa application. My success depends on this one particular employee. Give a small business one or two “express” H1B visas at little or no cost to the company. Grant it in less than 30 days and make it renewable for one year at a time. Don’t require that I pay a salary “at the market” if my business is smaller than a certain threshold revenue and/or number of employees – eliminate the Department of Labor in this “express” H1B process, in other words, if my business is small enough. Help my small business take advantage of the critical skills and experience in one key person who needs a visa, and help my business to be more nimble – grant my small business one or two express H1B visas.

IP Law – Renew Provisional Patent Applications; Shield Small Business from Litigation Costs and Adverse Settlements. 
Patents are wildly expensive. There is a limited time in which to file before IP rights are forfeit or abandoned. An infringement suit will ruin a small business that cannot afford a legal offense or defense. Current intellectual property law puts the small business at a distinct disadvantage, and these are the three areas of exposure that concern me the most. A patent can cost me between $10,000 and $20,000 to write and file to completion – just one patent, and the patenting process can consume four or five years! I have a year from first discovery to file a patent application, and by filing a provisional application, I can in effect add another year to the formal application filing deadline I am allowed. If my small company could renew a provisional application until such time as I can afford to make a complete formal application, I would benefit significantly. But the real issue I face is infringement – a large company that infringes on my IP can do so without fear of retribution because I cannot afford the time or money to sue, and if my small company inadvertently infringes on the IP of a large company that notices and sues, then I am ruined. Require low cost arbitration in lieu of litigation for IP disputes involving a small business. Shield the small business from infringement consequences and adverse settlements for as long as company revenue is less than a certain threshold amount. Limit future liability for infringement damages for IP invented while the business is small. Improving the IP landscape for the small business can accelerate innovations and reward those small companies like my own that can make better use of the IP.

Pass QUALITY Laws that are Essential, Minimal, Straight Forward and Readable; Benefits Must Exceed the Costs.
All legislation should pass a Cost-Benefit Analysis performed by a Government agency such as the GAO. A Cost-Benefit Analysis is a standard element of business decision making. For most all things, the cost can be measured, and the benefits measured, too. With few “American Values” exceptions, the benefits of every law passed by Congress should exceed the costs of the law. Periodic cost-benefit reviews should detect and eliminate laws with costs that significantly exceed cost estimates or benefits that significantly miss benefit estimates at the time of passage. All legislation should be tested by a panel of ordinary people before being signed into law – if the law can not be read and understood by ordinary people, it goes back to Congress for simplification. It’s QUALITY of law, not quantity of law that counts!

This is a large plate of issues and ideas – the conference call will be verrrry interesting!

Politics – My Take on Things Pt. 1

October 17, 2011

I rarely look at the political stage with high regard. It is showmanship and theater and beauty contest, and to the casual observer, it is filled with nothing but soundbites. I have a great many friends who are prone to listening for the soundbite, and critical thinking simply does not enter into the picture. I find this highly troubling.

Here are a few thoughts from my brain. Let’s see what the Republican debaters say tomorrow! Probably not much of any substance.

Tax Reform –

The current fallacy of modern taxation – the fairness pitfall is that money working for money (an investment) currently has a lower tax rate (15% capital gains rate) than labor or intellect working for money (up to 35% marginal tax rate). Money Talks – heck, the Supreme Court has ruled on more than one occasion that money is a protected vehicle of Free Speech. Corporations are afforded many of the same rights as people, and in some instances more rights and new rights that people don’t get to tap. My fear is that corporate influence will easily defeat meaningful tax reform.

Tax policy can drive significant elements of our economy. Want to encourage domestic investment? Lower the capital gains tax rate below the personal income tax rate. I bet that was the rationale for creating a lower capital gains tax rate in the first place – to keep investment dollars here in the US rather than see them go to Europe or Japan, though I have never seen that thought in print. I wonder what Congress’ actual rationale for establishing the lower gains rate was?

My view of personal income taxation is that all taxes – social security, medicare and internal revenue taxes should start to be assessed on the first dollar in excess of the annualized minimum wage plus some amount related to the number of dependents. A minimum wage worker, a welfare recipient or someone living in poverty should not be burdened by any taxes. Internal Revenue taxation is not too far from this principle. What is the justification, though, for the ceiling on Social Security wages  – why excuse the wealthy from this particular tax burden? Why excuse realized investment gains from social security and medicare taxes? I am genuinely asking the question – why was it done this way?

Market Volatility and the Occupy Wall Street Movement –

I am amazed that the “masses” who have lost relatively large portions of their 401K plan values and home value are complacent to “sit and take it” as they contemplate disappointing retirement prospects. They are still hopeful, I guess… One day, their losses will drive them to pick up signs and step beside the Occupy Wall Street protesters nationwide. There could be a ground swell of protest as the markets continue to dance around until dipping sharply with the next European financial calamity. My bet is that the Occupy Wall Street movement will grow dramatically next year.

Want to make the securities markets rational and suck the volatility from programmed trading out of the markets? Charge a Federal sales tax on every securities transaction whether at the market, an option or a future! I wonder how much tax revenue a 1% Federal financial transaction tax would generate? Hmmm… It won’t return the losses to the invested middle class, though.

Budget Deficits and Jobs

President Obama knows that troubled finances demand reform on the inflow and the outflow – on both ends. He “gets it”. I like President Obama, but he has a tendency to begin negotiations with an intransigent opponent with a meager appeal from the middle ground, and not something dramatic from the edge – you can’t move someone who is uncompromising towards the middle by starting from the middle – you can’t make radical change happen with baby steps. The President said that cutting the Federal Government’s mission and scope cuts jobs – he’s right. Cutting the Federal budget by 10% would potentially cut almost a half million Government jobs by my estimate at the very time when the President has challenged Congress to expand employment. The real challenge is to spend money smarter. I like President Obama, but I have to admit that I am disappointed by his small ambition to fix big problems.

I wish Robert Reich, President Clinton’s Secretary of Labour would run for President. He understands a thing or two about the “jobs economy”. He “get’s it” like few others do. I like Dr. Reich.

If Congress forms an “Infrastructure Bank” to rebuild roads and bridges and FAA systems and waterway systems to spur employment, it will only employ a small fraction of the unemployed. And it is unlikely to be sustained into the long term. A good idea with a small employment impact… But borrowing the money to rebuild infrastructures right now is cheap – a bargain! The newly reemployed in these programs would be dominantly manual laborers. There are vast numbers of highly skilled unemployed and underemployed who represent a huge untapped potential if employed and working hard – the “tails” are significantly unemployed – the least experienced and the most experienced face enormous hurdles in the labor market, and these programs do not address these highly (and narrowly) skilled workers very aggressively.

Speaking of unemployment, it is laughable that the official rate and the generally acknowledged actual rates are different by between a factor a half or a third…  The Government is wasting money to count a statistic that is simply and utterly wrong, and openly acknowledged as such. It’s a waste of my taxes for the Government to determine the unemployment rate. CNN can do better (and does). 14M unemployed; 11M underemployed; and how many uncounted?

My real concern for the future state of unemployment, in all candor, is that I’m not wealthy enough to employ security people to insulate me from the hardship of the unemployed. I don’t want indigents camping in our city parks or in my front yard or knocking on my door for food and other handouts. And they are already starting to knock on my door… This is one likely kind of societal impact from unemployment if it grows by a few more percent amidst Federal and State budget cuts that whack “survival” benefits.

This isn’t too organized a rant. Sorry about that. More later – maybe next Monday.

Scapegoats, Lies, Misdirected Retaliation

October 30, 2010

Warning – this is a political post of sorts – I am violating my own posting rules, and I won’t be accepting comments. I have license, after all, and Tuesday’s elections are just around the corner…

Let me Set the Stage…

At Rockwell, and later at Alcatel, I managed network management products – largely software, mostly misunderstood, and greatly unappreciated products. These products were very complex and somewhat “cantankerous”.  They overtaxed the computational resources of the time and required terrific amounts of RAM. One of my network management products required 2GB of ram, and in that day (the very late’80s), it was the largest amount of RAM that HP had ever installed in a computer. I think that RAM cost us upwards of $20,000 per CPU. RAM is much cheaper, now!

Wrestling for company resources was a brutal experience – it was nasty politics at times. When a sales opportunity for transport products fell through, the excuse was a lack of the right network management product in the product line in one instance. When a transport product release was late, one excuse ventured was distraction and insufficient resources in the development groups due in part to a focus on interfacing with “unnecessary network management products”. When budgets were cut, the first target was the network management product line that “contributed nothing” to the bottom line – “nothing but headaches…”. Not true – none of those claims were true, but that was the persuasive opinion posed by people who were competing for scarce resources. It required a lot of time and energy to defend my own resources and propel my products forward. I was successful only through the consistent and continuous presentation of facts.

Yup – nasty politics – but, that’s reality. Politics is embedded in some way in every decision – in the household, the community, the company and the country. The levers of National politics are the same as corporate politics.  When times are good, “the facts speak for themselves” – sometimes a bit too gloriously and sometimes a bit embellished – and no one notices the inaccuracies. When times are bad, it seems that accurate facts don’t matter at all, and the search for a scapegoat commences – or a distraction surfaces – or falsehoods are “a dime a dozen”. What is most distressing is that  in good times and bad, facts simply don’t seem to matter today – emotions and persuasively posed opinions easily take the center stage, scapegoating becomes a common defense tactic, and misdirected retaliation satisfies the masses. Falsehoods are readily swallowed by those who “like what they hear” and who are either too busy or too lazy to dig just a little bit deeper to check the facts for themselves. Sometimes, I think I am watching a bunch of children run the world!

My Point: Where are the Facts in this Election?

I get nervous when I look for facts to support decisions and don’t find them. I get really anxious when debate is opinion-focused and not fact-focused.  And I swear that the sky is falling when all I see and hear are diversionary tactics such as scapegoating, lies and misdirected retaliation galore. Well, the sky is falling…

The National politics today is rich in scapegoats, lies and misdirected retaliation – “Muslim terrorists”, illegal immigrants (anti-any immigrants for that matter), the Chinese, the immoral perverts who prey on our children. Dribble. I was incensed when a news reporter recently quipped that, “we were attacked by Muslims on 9/11”, and that was why there shouldn’t be a Mosque near old World Trade Center. My Goodness – we were attacked by a group of extremists, and extremist groups come in every stripe and color. I guess that we were attacked by Christians in Oklahoma City (try an “extremist group”).

What is happening here is that fear is being “farmed” – fed and harvested and transformed into anger. The Nazis were skillful at doing this, and it is beginning to happen right here and right now. Look at the emerging Tea Party – a movement of anger fueled by fear that seeks (through individual voices not well unified, yet) to eliminate the Fed, shred the IRS, halt immigration, abolish the 14th Amendment, withdraw from the World economic community (the Group of 20), and perhaps even pull out of the U.N. And when angry groups are motivated by fear, things get dangerous as reckless and irrational people grab power to make shortsighted changes with a huge potential for dramatic and calamitous unintended consequences.

I like the smell of chocolate chip cookies, fresh baked bread – and Facts.

I fear that as the economy continues to stutter and the rich get richer and the poor get poorer, I will like less and less what I “smell” as politics become more urgent and desperate and polarized and irrational with scapegoating, lies and misdirected retaliation at every turn – and more and more opinions will trump cold hard facts…

Who is dedicated to presenting the facts? Too few people.

(I like the smell of cookies – I like the smell of cookies – I like the smell of cookies)